Understanding Arizona's Implied Consent Law for DUI Testing

Investigative Article

The Truth Behind Arizona's Implied Consent Law for DUI

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a serious offense in Arizona, and law enforcement officers are tasked with keeping the roads safe by enforcing DUI laws. One of the ways they do this is through the use of implied consent laws, which automatically assume a driver's agreement to chemical testing if stopped for suspicion of driving under the influence. However, there is more to this law than meets the eye. In this investigative article, we delve into the truth behind Arizona's implied consent law and the implications of refusing chemical testing.

The Origins of the Implied Consent Law

The implied consent law in Arizona originated in the 1930s and was implemented to reduce the number of drunk driving incidents on the roads. At that time, there were no laws in place to allow police officers to test drivers for alcohol or drug use, which meant they had no way of proving that someone was driving under the influence. This led to many drunk driving incidents going unpunished and an alarming increase in road fatalities.

With the implementation of implied consent laws, drivers were deemed to have automatically given their consent to chemical testing if pulled over for suspicion of DUI. Refusing to comply with chemical testing would result in an automatic suspension of driving privileges, even if the individual was later found not guilty of a DUI.

How Implied Consent Works in Arizona

In Arizona, implied consent laws are outlined in ARS § 28-1321 and refer to the automatic agreement by drivers to submit to chemical testing if law enforcement suspects them of driving under the influence. When a driver receives their license, they are giving their implied consent to be tested for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) or drug levels if a law enforcement officer has reasonable grounds to believe they are impaired.

The officer typically decides which type of test will be administered, and the driver has the right to request an independent test be performed at their own expense. Refusing to submit to the testing can result in an automatic suspension of driving privileges, even if the individual is not ultimately convicted of a DUI.

The Implications of Refusing Chemical Testing

Refusing to comply with chemical testing in Arizona can have serious consequences, even if the individual is not ultimately convicted of a DUI. If a driver refuses to submit to a blood alcohol or drug test, their license will be suspended for 12 months for a first offense and 24 months for a second or subsequent offense. These suspensions are automatic and happen regardless of whether the driver is found guilty of a DUI.

It is important to note that Arizona does allow drivers to refuse a field sobriety test without consequence, but this is not the case for chemical testing. Refusing chemical testing could also result in a longer jail sentence if the individual is later found guilty of a DUI, as this refusal could be viewed as an attempt to hide evidence of guilt.

The Debate Over Implied Consent Laws

The use of implied consent laws for chemical testing in DUI cases has been a topic of debate for many years. Some argue that these laws infringe on an individual's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. Others argue that these laws are necessary to keep dangerous drivers off the road and protect the public.

Regardless of which side of the debate you fall on, it is important to understand how implied consent laws work and the consequences of refusing chemical testing in Arizona. If you find yourself in this situation, it is important to seek the advice of an experienced DUI defense attorney.

The Bottom Line

Implied consent laws in Arizona are in place to help reduce the number of drunk driving incidents on the roads. These laws automatically assume a driver's agreement to chemical testing if stopped for suspicion of driving under the influence. Refusing to comply with chemical testing can result in an automatic suspension of driving privileges, even if the individual is not ultimately convicted of a DUI. While the use of implied consent laws for chemical testing in DUI cases remains a topic of debate, it is important to understand how these laws work and the potential consequences of refusing chemical testing in Arizona.

Arizona's Implied Consent Law for DUI

Share:

Read More

Former Superior Court Judge Joins Kolsrud Law Offices for Federal Criminal Defense

News Article

Former Superior Court Judge David R Cole Joins Kolsrud Law Offices

Kolsrud Law Offices welcomed former Maricopa County Superior Court Judge David R. "Dave" Cole as of counsel to their Federal Criminal Defense Legal Team. This announcement is a major development for the firm as they add a well-respected legal personality to their team. David Cole's experience in criminal law provides a valuable addition to the firm's capacity to serve its clients.

Background and Achievements of David R. Cole

David R. Cole was appointed as a judge on the Maricopa County Superior Court bench in March 2002 by Governor Jane Dee Hull. Prior to his appointment to the judiciary, Cole worked as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Arizona and as a Maricopa County Deputy County Attorney, where he prosecuted complex criminal cases.

Cole has an impressive record of legal achievement, including his role in the conviction of the Serial Shooter, Dale S. Hausner. Additionally, he received the Innovations Award from the Arizona Prosecuting Attorneys' Advisory Council for his Wildland Fire Prosecution Program.

Legal Profession and Practicing Law

After retiring from the Maricopa County Superior Court bench in 2023, Cole decided to join Kolsrud Law Offices. According to Cole, he has spent his entire adult life involved in the legal profession and it was a natural progression to transition to legal practice.

Kolsrud Law Offices is a criminal defense law firm specializing in federal criminal defense in Arizona. Cole's addition to the firm will improve their capacity to provide the best possible legal representation to their clients. While working as a judge, Cole had an excellent reputation for being fair and impartial. His experience in criminal law will be put to good use by Kolsrud Law Offices in representing clients faced with criminal charges.

The Addition of David R. Cole to Kolsrud Law Offices and Its Benefits

Cole's addition to the Kolsrud Law Offices legal team is a significant development for the firm. With his experience and expertise in criminal law, the firm can enhance the quality of its services. The criminal justice system can be complicated and requires competent legal representation to achieve a favorable outcome. The addition of Cole to the team will strengthen the firm's ability to help clients navigate the judicial system effectively.

Kolsrud Law Offices and its History of Excellence in Criminal Law

Kolsrud Law Offices is a well-respected criminal defense law firm with a strong record of providing high-quality legal representation. The firm has years of experience in handling complex criminal cases. They have developed a reputation as a trusted firm that clients can rely on to help them achieve the best possible legal outcomes. The firm's commitment to excellence and their expertise in federal criminal defense makes them one of the most sought-after law firms in Arizona.

The Future of Kolsrud Law Offices with David R. Cole as its Newest Addition

The future of Kolsrud Law Offices with David R. Cole as its newest addition looks bright. His reputation, experience, and expertise in criminal law will add value to the firm's legal team. The addition of David R. Cole further bolsters the firm's ability to provide excellent legal representation to its clients.

Overall, the move by Cole to join Kolsrud Law Offices as of counsel is a significant development for both the firm and the legal community in Arizona.

Former Superior Court Judge David R Cole Joins Kolsrud Law Offices

Share:

Read More

Joshua Kolsrud Addresses Change of Plea & Sentence for Loraine Pellegrino

Feature Article: Joshua Kolsrud Addresses the Recent Change of Plea and Sentence of Mrs. Loraine Pellegrino

On August 6, 2024, Joshua Kolsrud, renowned federal defense attorney, released a press statement addressing the recent change of plea and sentence of his client, Mrs. Loraine Pellegrino. Mrs. Pellegrino, a defendant in a federal indictment, pled guilty to a lesser misdemeanor charge and was sentenced to unsupervised probation and community service.

The Case of Mrs. Loraine Pellegrino

Mrs. Loraine Pellegrino, a resident of Phoenix, AZ, was indicted by federal authorities on charges of racketeering, money laundering, and conspiracy in May 2023. The charges were brought against her and several other individuals alleged of being involved in fraudulent schemes involving government contracts. The indictment accused Mrs. Pellegrino of being part of a racketeering enterprise that defrauded the government of millions of dollars.

Mrs. Pellegrino vehemently denied the charges against her and sought the legal representation of Joshua Kolsrud, a federal defense attorney with more than two decades of experience in defending clients against similar charges.

The Change of Plea and Sentence

According to the press release by Joshua Kolsrud, Mrs. Pellegrino changed her plea to guilty but only for a lesser misdemeanor charge. This implies that she admitted to a lesser degree of culpability than what was originally alleged against her. The sentence was also less severe with Mrs. Pellegrino avoiding prison time and instead being sentenced to unsupervised probation and community service.

Kolsrud, in his statement, lauded the decision of Mrs. Pellegrino stating that he respected her choice and that his client's decision to accept responsibility allowed her to move on from this situation with her life ahead of her. He thanked the court for their impartiality and noted that the sentence was appropriate given the circumstances.

The Impact of the Change of Plea and Sentence

The decision of Mrs. Pellegrino to plead guilty to a lesser charge and receive a lesser sentence has significant consequences both for her and the other parties involved in the indictment. One impact is that Mrs. Pellegrino will avoid prison time, and instead will serve her sentence with unsupervised probation and community service. This less severe sentence allows Mrs. Pellegrino to continue living her life while complying with the requirements of her sentence.

Another impact is that Mrs. Pellegrino's decision to plead guilty to a lesser charge may have implications for other parties indicted in the case. The decision may signal to other defendants that it's in their best interest to accept a plea deal rather than stand trial and face the possibility of a conviction on the original charges. In this way, Mrs. Pellegrino's decision could serve as a precedent for other similar cases.

The Reputation of Joshua Kolsrud

The decision of Mrs. Pellegrino to change her plea to guilty to a lesser charge and receive a lesser sentence is, in part, a testament to the reputation of her attorney, Joshua Kolsrud. Joshua Kolsrud has been practicing law for more than 20 years as a federal defense attorney. His experience, knowledge, and commitment to his clients have earned him a reputation as one of the most accomplished and respected attorneys in his field.

Kolsrud has represented clients in numerous high-profile cases, and his track record of defending his clients' rights and interests is remarkable. His experience in federal defense law provides clients with the assurance that they have the best possible defense when facing criminal charges or other legal issues.

The Future for Mrs. Pellegrino

The change of plea and sentence in the case of Mrs. Pellegrino represents a turning point in her life. The lesser sentence allows her to continue living her life and puts the legal troubles she has faced behind her. It also provides her with an opportunity to reflect and make changes that will enable her to move forward positively.

Joshua Kolsrud's representation of Mrs. Pellegrino has enabled her to receive a fair and impartial hearing and a chance to start fresh. His legal knowledge, experience, and tireless efforts in defending his clients' rights have enabled Mrs. Pellegrino to be in the best position possible to move forward, and the outcome of this case has given her the chance to do so.

The Legacy of this Case

The indictment of Mrs. Loraine Pellegrino and the subsequent change of her plea and sentence will be remembered as one of the most high-profile cases in recent times. The case demonstrates the complexities and challenges associated with federal defense law. The change of plea and sentence for Mrs. Pellegrino also highlights the importance of having competent legal representation in such cases.

Joshua Kolsrud's representation of Mrs. Pellegrino and the successful outcome of this case sets a precedent for future federal defense cases. The reputation of Joshua Kolsrud as a competent and experienced federal defense attorney will continue to attract clients who seek the best possible legal representation to defend their rights and interests.

Joshua Kolsrud Addresses The Recent Change of Plea and Sentence of Mrs. Loraine Pellegrino

The impact of the decision by Mrs. Loraine Pellegrino to plead guilty to a lesser charge and receive a lesser sentence is significant. It represents a turning point in her life, and the outcome of the case has given her the opportunity to start fresh. The legal representation provided by Joshua Kolsrud has enabled her to receive a fair and impartial hearing, and his tireless efforts in defending his clients' rights have enabled Mrs. Pellegrino to be in the best position possible to move forward and live a positive life. To read more about the case, please visit Joshua, Loraine.

Share:

Read More

The Advantages of Hiring a Divorce Attorney: Pro Per Party Explained

The Advantages of Hiring a Divorce Attorney When Going Through a Divorce

Introduction

Embarking on a divorce can be emotionally draining, financially strenuous, and legally complex. For some couples, the first thought is to represent themselves by acting "pro per," which can lead to risks and challenges. In this article, we will examine the advantages of hiring a divorce attorney when going through a divorce.

What is a Divorce Attorney?

A divorce attorney is a professional legal advisor who specializes in divorce matters. Divorce attorneys counsel and represent their clients throughout the entire divorce process that involves dividing property, child custody, alimony, and child support. They also help their clients understand their legal rights, obligations, and responsibilities under the law.

Proficiency in the Law

Divorce attorneys are proficient in the law and have specialized training in divorce laws and procedures. They understand the complexities of the law and are well equipped to handle any legal issues that may arise during the divorce process. A divorce attorney can help ensure that the divorce process is conducted within the confines of the law.

Objective Advice

A divorce attorney can provide insightful and objective advice that is not clouded by emotions that often come with a divorce. The attorney can provide an unbiased perspective on the situation and help their client make informed decisions that are in their best interest.

Legal Paperwork and Documentation

The legal paperwork involved in a divorce can be overwhelming. Divorce attorneys are familiar with the forms, documents, and deadlines that need to be filed throughout the divorce process. Attorneys can ensure that the paperwork is completed accurately and promptly to avoid any delays or complications that may arise.

Reduced Stress Level

Divorce is a stressful process that can have a lasting impact on an individual's emotional well-being. Hiring a divorce attorney can help ease the burden and reduce the stress level of going through a divorce. An attorney can handle legal matters while the client focuses on moving forward during this difficult time.

Court Representation

If a divorce case goes to court, an attorney can provide representation and advocacy. They can present their client's case in the best possible light, argue their client's position, and negotiate on their behalf. An attorney can help their client understand the legal procedures involved in a trial and provide crucial guidance throughout the process.

Expert Negotiator

Hiring a divorce attorney can benefit the client in negotiations with the other party, especially regarding property division, child custody, and support. An attorney can help ensure that their client gets the best possible outcome in the negotiations by presenting it from a legal perspective and arguing persuasively in their client's interests.

Conclusion

Embarking on a divorce is never easy, but with the right professional assistance, it can be less stressful. Hiring a divorce attorney can provide many advantages, including expertise in the law, objective advice, handling the legal paperwork, a reduced level of stress, court representation, and expert negotiation. Hiring a divorce attorney can help ensure that the divorce process is conducted efficiently, effectively, and within the confines of the law. Divorce Attorney-Pro,Divorce

Share:

Read More

Former Superior Court Judge David R Cole Joins Kolsrud Law Offices as Counsel for Federal Criminal Defense Team

Profile Article

Profile of Former Superior Court Judge David R. Cole

Former Superior Court Judge David R. Cole has joined Kolsrud Law Offices, a respected criminal defense law firm based in Phoenix, Arizona, as of counsel to its Federal Criminal Defense Legal Team. Cole’s distinguished career on the bench and in private practice makes him a valuable addition to the team.

Background and Early Career

David R. Cole was born in Phoenix, Arizona in 1955. He graduated from Arizona State University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science in 1977 and earned his Juris Doctor degree from the Arizona State University College of Law in 1980.

After graduation, Cole began his legal career as a prosecutor in the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, where he served for 16 years. During his tenure, he successfully prosecuted some of the most high-profile cases in Arizona, including the infamous “Baseline Killer” case.

Career on the Bench

In 2002, Cole was appointed to the Maricopa County Superior Court by then-Governor Jane Dee Hull. During his 12 years on the bench, Cole presided over numerous high-profile cases, including the trial of Jodi Arias, which drew national attention.

Cole was known for his fairness, impartiality, and dedication to the law. He was respected by his colleagues on the bench and by the attorneys who appeared before him.

Private Practice

After retiring from the bench in 2014, Cole went into private practice, focusing on criminal defense and civil litigation. He brought with him a wealth of knowledge and experience gained from his years as a prosecutor and a judge.

As a defense attorney, Cole was committed to ensuring that his clients received the best possible representation. He was known for his thorough preparation, attention to detail, and persuasive advocacy.

Joining Kolsrud Law Offices

Cole’s addition to the Kolsrud Law Offices Federal Criminal Defense Legal Team is a significant achievement for the firm. His reputation as a skilled litigator and his experience on the bench will be valuable assets to the team.

Kolsrud Law Offices is one of the most respected criminal defense firms in Arizona, with a proven track record of success in handling a wide range of criminal cases. The addition of Cole to the team further strengthens the firm’s capabilities and enhances its reputation.

Conclusion

Former Superior Court Judge David R. Cole’s impressive background and experience make him a valuable addition to Kolsrud Law Offices’ Federal Criminal Defense Legal Team. His dedication to the law, commitment to justice, and reputation as a skilled litigator make him an asset to the firm and to his clients.

For more information about David R. Cole and his role at Kolsrud Law Offices, visit Kolsrud Law Offices.

Share:

Read More

Understanding Arizona's Covenant Marriage: ARS 25-903 Explained

Feature Article: The Ins and Outs of Covenant Marriage in Arizona

A covenant marriage is a legally binding commitment between two people who wish to be married. The idea behind this type of marriage is to make the union more difficult to dissolve in an effort to strengthen the sanctity of the institution of marriage. The concept originated in the United States and has been adopted by several states, including Arizona. In this article, we'll explore the ins and outs of covenant marriage in Arizona and the pros and cons of choosing this type of marriage.

What is Covenant Marriage?

A covenant marriage is a type of marriage that requires a couple to make a more significant commitment to their relationship than a traditional marriage. In a covenant marriage, the couple agrees to seek pre-marital counseling, limit their reasons for divorce, and work on resolving conflict within their marriage before considering a divorce. This type of marriage is only recognized in three states: Arizona, Louisiana, and Arkansas. Covenant marriage is based on the belief that marriage is a lifetime commitment and should only be entered into after careful consideration and counseling.

How to Enter Covenant Marriage in Arizona?

To enter into a covenant marriage in Arizona, the couple must sign a declaration of intent to enter into a covenant marriage. The declaration must be signed by both parties and notarized. The couple must also attend premarital counseling with a licensed counselor or member of the clergy for at least four hours before the wedding. Additionally, the marriage license must state that the couple is entering into a covenant marriage.

What are the Pros of Covenant Marriage?

One of the main advantages of a covenant marriage is that it reinforces the commitment to the marriage. A couple who enters into a covenant marriage is more likely to work through marital problems and avoid divorce. Additionally, covenant marriage can provide a stronger sense of family and community. Lastly, covenant marriages may offer couples more legal protections in the event of a divorce.

What are the Cons of Covenant Marriage?

Some people argue that covenant marriages do not allow couples the freedom to make their own decisions about their relationship. Critics also argue that the focus on counseling and requiring fault-based grounds for divorce can make the divorce process more difficult. Additionally, covenant marriages may not be recognized in certain states, which can cause problems if a couple moves or travels across state lines.

Can I Convert My Current Marriage to a Covenant Marriage?

If you are currently married, you and your spouse can convert your marriage to a covenant marriage by signing a declaration of intent to convert to a covenant marriage. However, you will still be required to attend premarital counseling, and there may be additional legal fees involved.

What are the Grounds for Divorce in a Covenant Marriage?

One of the defining characteristics of a covenant marriage is that there are limited grounds for divorce. In a traditional marriage, spouses can file for a no-fault divorce, meaning they do not need to establish any wrongdoing on the part of their spouse. In a covenant marriage, spouses must establish that there has been adultery, abuse, abandonment, or a felony conviction before they can file for divorce. Additionally, if both spouses agree, they can file for divorce after two years of separation.

Should You Choose a Covenant Marriage in Arizona?

If you are considering a covenant marriage in Arizona, it is essential to weigh the pros and cons carefully. While the idea of a lifelong commitment may seem appealing, the limited grounds for divorce and counseling requirements can be challenging. It is also important to remember that a covenant marriage may not be recognized if you move to another state. Ultimately, whether you choose a covenant marriage or traditional marriage depends on your personal beliefs and values.

In conclusion, a covenant marriage is a legally binding commitment that requires spouses to work through their marital problems and limit their reasons for divorce. While it may not be the right choice for everyone, a covenant marriage can strengthen marriage and family bonds and provide additional legal protections. If you are considering a covenant marriage in Arizona, make sure to weigh the pros and cons and discuss your decision with your partner.

covenant marriage Arizona

Share:

Read More

What to do when your ex refuses to sell the house: Options and Rights

Feature Article: Dividing Assets in a Divorce

The Family Home: A Contentious Issue in Divorce

When a relationship comes to an end, the painful process of separation involves dividing assets that were once shared. Assets may include personal property, bank accounts, and real estate, among others. The family home often emerges as a contentious issue. In many cases, one of the partners may refuse to sell the family home, leading to a deadlock in the separation process. This article will explore the options available to individuals who find themselves in this situation.

1. Understanding the Legal Context of Divorce

Divorces are regulated by state laws, and even though laws vary from state to state, the principles by which assets are divided in a separation remain the same. In most states, assets that were acquired during the marriage are regarded as shared property. Like any other shared property, the family home will need to be split between the divorcing spouses. However, some factors need to be considered when dividing property, including the value of each asset and the income of each partner.

2. The Options Available to Divorcing Partners

When one spouse refuses to sell the family home, it can be complicated to find a resolution. Some of the options available to divorcing partners include:

Negotiation:

Negotiation is a common method used to solve conflicts between partners in a divorce. In this case, the concerned partners can engage a mediator or a lawyer to help them find a resolution. The negotiator helps the couple come to an agreement on how to divide the assets, including the family home.

Buyout:

If one partner refuses to sell the family home, the other partner can opt to buy out the other's share. In most cases, the buying partner will need to refinance the home, pay off the other partner's share of equity, and take full ownership of the property.

Court Action:

If all else fails, a partner may have to seek legal help and file a motion with the court to force a sale. However, this option can be lengthy and expensive, and the parties concerned may lose control over the outcome.

3. Working with a Family Law Legal Paraprofessional

Divorce proceedings can be emotionally and physically draining. Working with a family law legal paraprofessional can take some of that stress away. Legal paraprofessionals are individuals who work with licensed lawyers to provide legal services, including family law. They can help you understand and navigate the legal landscape during a divorce, including the options available when it comes to dividing your assets.

4. Conclusion

If you find yourself in a situation where your ex-spouse is refusing to sell the family home, it is best to consult with a family law legal paraprofessional to understand your rights and legal options. Dividing assets in a divorce is a complex and emotional process, and it is essential to have the right people on your side. Refusal, Legal-De Novo Law offers a team of experienced family law legal paraprofessionals who can help you find your best options and understand your rights when it comes to selling a shared property.

Share:

Read More

Appealing a Child Custody Ruling: Legal Process, Grounds, and Key Factors to Consider

Opinion Article: Why the Legal Approach to Child Custody Needs to Change

An Overview

The emotional and legal process of appealing a child custody ruling in Arizona can be overwhelming, and it is essential to understand the legal procedures and requirements to effectively navigate this challenge. Grounds for appeal may include concerns about legal errors, abuse of discretion, and procedural issues, among others. However, we believe that it is time for a significant shift in how we approach child custody in our legal system. The current system leaves it up to judges to make critical decisions concerning the welfare and future of a child, but we argue that this is insufficient. We need to consider fundamental reform in how families approach custody, with an emphasis on co-parenting and shared responsibilities. In this article, we will examine the current child custody system's weaknesses and offer an alternative approach to achieve the best outcomes for children and their parents.

The Current Child Custody System

The traditional approach to child custody places an enormous burden on parents and children alike, and we believe it can be a considerable source of stress for all parties involved. The legal process of deciding child custody often results in one parent receiving primary physical custody, where the other parent gets a visitation schedule. Although this may work for some families, it opens opportunities for bitter custody battles if the parties cannot come to a conclusion. Such legal battles can have long-lasting negative consequences for the children, and we argue that they are often unnecessary. The current system focuses on the rights of the parties involved, rather than the child's best interests, which is often forgotten in the legal proceedings. In addition, the considerable expense associated with lengthy litigation also makes the current process inaccessible to many families.

An Alternative Approach

At our law firm, we have seen that the most successful child custody arrangements are based on co-parenting and shared responsibilities. Parents who collaborate can ensure that their child receives the necessary emotional support and stability that they need. Co-parenting is a significant factor in achieving successful custody outcomes, and it is an approach that we believe must be emphasized more in the current system. The legal process should move away from determining a "winning" parent and towards determining how parents can work together to provide the best possible outcome for their child. A proposed solution is the implementation of parenting classes that can help parents learn constructive communication strategies and provide them with the necessary tools to foster a healthy co-parenting relationship. Such a program can encourage parents to work together, focus on their child's interests, and also ensure that they have a successful ongoing relationship after the legal custody battle is over.

Key Factors in Child Custody Decisions

During an appeal or a trial, several factors influence a judge's custody decision, including the child's preferences, parental interaction, and any history of domestic violence. Understanding these factors can help parents prepare better for their custody hearing. Child's Wishes: Often, children above a certain age may express their wishes in custody proceedings. Although it is not the sole determining factor, it can significantly influence the court's decision. Parental Interaction: Parents who can work together to put their child's interests first and communicate effectively often present a more compelling case for custody. Domestic Violence: Any history of domestic violence, or its threat, is a crucial factor in custody decisions.

The Importance of Legal Representation

Appealing a child custody ruling or seeking any modifications can be legally complex and overwhelming without proper legal counsel. Having experienced and skilled family law attorneys like those at Colburn Hintze Maletta can significantly increase a parent's chances of a favorable outcome. Our attorneys have extensive knowledge and experience in Arizona's legal system and can guide parents through the process while ensuring the best interests of the child.

Conclusion

The legal process of appealing a child custody ruling in Arizona can be emotionally and financially draining, and we believe that the current system must change. Instead of focusing on parents' rights, the legal process must prioritize the child's best interests and emphasize the co-parenting approach. Parents who can work together to provide a stable and loving environment for their child are more likely to achieve long-term success. If you require legal assistance, contact the experienced family law attorneys at Colburn Hintze Maletta today. Appealing-Child Custody

Share:

Read More

Navigating a Divorce: What to Do When Your Ex Won't Sell the House

Feature Article: Understanding Your Options When Your Ex Refuses to Sell the Family Home

Breaking up is hard to do, but it becomes even more challenging when assets are involved. One of the most common sources of conflict in a separation or divorce is the family home. What happens when one partner refuses to sell the house? It can be an emotionally charged and stressful time, but understanding your options can give you a sense of control and direction. In this feature article, we will delve into your rights and the choices you can make when faced with an obstinate ex-partner.

What Does the Law Say?

When you own a home jointly with someone else–be it marital or common-law–there are different property laws in each state or province that dictate what happens in the case of a separation. Typically, the law provides that where one partner wants to sell the family home after the separation, they can bring an application to the court to have the property listed for sale against the wishes of their ex-spouse or partner.

Options for selling the house

There are several methods you can use to sell the house if your ex-partner refuses:

Mediation

Mediation is a low-key and inexpensive way to resolve conflicts surrounding the sale of the home with the help of a neutral third party. The mediator will work with both partners to understand their perspectives and suggest solutions, and the process will continue until they find an agreement.

Arbitration

Arbitration is similar to mediation in that it involves a neutral third party, but instead of working collaboratively to find an agreement, a decision is made to resolve the conflict. In arbitration, the arbitrator listens to arguments from both parties and makes a final and binding decision in the case.

Going to court

If mediation and arbitration are unsuccessful, the final solution is to go to court. In most cases, a judge will order the sale of the house and the proceeds will be divided according to the couple’s respective investments in the property. However, an order from the court can take a long time to obtain, and the process can be relatively expensive when compared to mediation and arbitration.

What happens if the house cannot be sold?

If the family home cannot be sold for any number of reasons, such as negative equity, there are still several options you can explore:

Rent the house

Renting out the property is an option that can generate income and allow both parties to maintain financial stability while waiting for the housing market to improve. The rental can be short or long term, depending on the individual situation and preferences.

Buying out your ex-partner’s share

If one partner can afford to purchase the other’s portion of the property, it can be a viable solution to end the deadlock in the separation process. In such a case, the share can be sold to the partner who wants to keep the family home without forcing them to sell the property.

Seek Professional Assistance

When dealing with a family home that is part of a separation, it is always recommended to seek professional help. With the help of a family law legal paraprofessional, you can get an unbiased opinion on the situation and understand your rights and options. Additionally, they can provide legal assistance and represent you in court, if necessary.

Conclusion

When your ex-partner refuses to sell the family home, it can be a difficult and stressful time. However, with the right information and support, you can find solutions that work for both parties. Whether it is mediation, arbitration, or going to court, always remember that there are options available. Seek assistance from a family law legal paraprofessional who can provide the support and legal advice you need to navigate the challenging aspects of the separation process.

House Selling-Ex,Options

Share:

Read More

When Your Ex Won't Sell Your House: Options and Advice from Family Law Experts

Feature Article: Dividing Assets After a Relationship: How to Manage When Your Ex Refuses to Sell Your Shared Property

Dividing assets is one of the most significant challenges that couples will have to face when their relationship comes to a close. Family homes often become a source of conflict, with one partner sometimes refusing to sell the house. This scenario can cause a deadlock in the separation process, leaving both parties feeling stuck and frustrated. If you find yourself in this situation, you can turn to family law legal paraprofessionals who can help you understand your options and rights when it comes to selling a shared property.

The Emotional Toll of Dividing Assets

Couples who have decided to part ways often experience a range of emotions, including anger, sadness, confusion, and fear. The division of assets is an especially fraught process since it can quickly become acrimonious. In some cases, one partner may feel entitled to keep the family home, even if it negatively affects the other party. This type of situation makes the separation process more challenging, as it can result in financial losses and emotional distress.

Understanding Your Options

If your ex-partner refuses to sell your shared property, there are several options you can explore. While not all these options may be ideal, they can provide you with a sense of control and clarity about the situation.

1. Mediation

Mediation is a process where an impartial third party, the mediator, helps both parties communicate and negotiate to reach a settlement. During mediation, a mediator will work with you and your ex-partner to explore a range of solutions to resolve the issue. Mediation can be an ideal solution if both parties are open to negotiation and are willing to cooperate. It is cost-effective and confidential, allowing you to move towards an agreement that works for you both.

2. Legal Advice

When your ex-partner refuses to sell the house, it is vital to seek legal advice. A solicitor can help you understand your rights and responsibilities when it comes to the shared ownership of property. They can guide you through the legal process and provide legal representation if necessary. Your lawyer can also advise you on how to approach your ex-partner and how best to negotiate the sale of the property or other forms of settlement.

3. Court Proceedings

If you’ve exhausted all other options and still can’t reach an agreement with your ex-partner, the final option is to take the matter to court. In court proceedings, a judge will make a determination on who owns the property and what should be done to resolve the situation. Court proceedings can be time-consuming and expensive, often requiring legal representation. While it should be a last resort, it can offer a sense of finality and bring closure to the situation.

Conclusion

The division of assets after a relationship ends is never easy, especially when one party refuses to sell a shared property. However, it is essential to seek legal advice and explore a range of options to help you and your ex-partner come to an agreement that works for both of you. At De Novo Law, our team of experienced family law legal paraprofessionals can help you understand your options and provide guidance and support throughout the process.

If you are struggling with this issue, please visit dividing assets after a relationship with an ex-partner who refuses to sell your shared property to learn more about how to get the help you need.

Share:

Read More